Additional notes (tip transient only).
-Master concept: In the way that range bars are ‘perfected’ in being able to calculate which pip value to use per bar, would this transient concept would be perfected if I were able to identify which h to use.
-PNR-Point of No Return: If price has extended a certain point away from the tip, can we know that it is likely transient before the h has completed?
-Is it true/how true is it that a wave trajectory cannot change until it has taken out the transient zone ‘blocking’ it?
Green denoting the ‘resistance’ to be taken out in going up. In wave land, I also continue to notice the .5-.7 retrace followed by the 1.5 extension being hit. Denoted in yellow.. like clockwork
Edit: Will edit as I get around to working on the foundation lol! Will edit tomorrow as I work on the foundation.
-Master concept: In the way that range bars are ‘perfected’ in being able to calculate which pip value to use per bar, would this transient concept would be perfected if I were able to identify which h to use.
> Yes it would be perfect as this means you would conquer the issue of time duration (something that I did not solve). I would like to see what you can come up with 🙂
-PNR-Point of No Return: If price has extended a certain point away from the tip, can we know that it is likely transient before the h has completed?
> I am not sure. I did not complete the testing, but 50% of previous range created by left side h bars seem to show something.
-Is it true/how true is it that a wave trajectory cannot change until it has taken out the transient zone ‘blocking’ it?
> Implying a reversing wave trajectory? From what I know, it cannot change; price would range in the small range created by 2 (smaller, lower timeframe) transient zones, to ‘pass time’, until time permits the break.